This time isn’t different

For the entirety of my career I have heard pundits describe why this time is different referring to the markets or an asset class. It seems almost as soon as an asset class performs well relative to another that the victor is declared a “game changer” or some other moniker. They favor this asset class at the expense of the other and state their case strongly often confusing the recent past for the future. At Russell we most recently saw this trend when clients wanted to overweight U.S. stocks against international equities.

And who could blame them? While the most recent sovereign debt crisis “news” in Europe seems to indicate an improving situation there are few folks that believe the challenges are completely gone. With this in mind it seems reasonable for an investor to underweight or outright avoid Europe. At the best, it seems difficult to acquire a taste for investing in Europe. But is this a reasonable course of action? Should last year’s returns drive this year’s asset allocation? ¹

Now I admit that it took me over 30 years to develop an affinity for broccoli. Even now I am far more likely to reach for a cut of meat as opposed to a healthy dose of vegetables no matter how clear the evidence is that I should always stick to a balanced diet. In many ways, asset allocation requires the exact same type of discipline. It isn’t enough to know I should follow the asset allocation my financial advisor and I agreed to. I have to invest and rebalance to my target or “policy” weights. This means that when I don’t want to buy out of favor asset classes may be when I should be doing this very thing. Just as I should pass on a little steak in exchange for my veggies so should I maintain my exposure to challenged asset classes. As the French might say, Mangez votre broccoli!

This time isn't different

At Russell we don’t claim to have a crystal ball to always know which asset class or region will do best each year. Instead, we have a disciplined investment process that has been built over the last 76 years. That process reminds us that diversification and asset allocation may work over time. The history of this process also reminds us that usually as the Germans might say, Dieses Mal ist nicht anders.


¹ For a comparison of U.S. and European equity returns please see the 2012 Global outlook

Mangez votre broccoli = Eat your broccoli
Dieses Mal ist nicht anders = This time is no different

Diversification and strategic asset allocation do not assure profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

Russell Investment Group is a Washington, USA corporation, which operates through subsidiaries worldwide, including Russell Investments, and is a subsidiary of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Russell Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA, 1301 Second Avenue, 18th Floor, Seattle, WA 98101, part of Russell Investments.

Copyright© 2012


CORP-7488

Posted in Asset Allocation, Capital markets insights, Investing | Leave a comment

A silver lining amid a down week in the markets

With the Russell 2000® Index off by nearly 2 percent for the week, investors clearly are expressing concerns over ongoing uncertainty surrounding Spain’s handling of its economic bailout, as well as China’s slower growth results. But, says Portfolio Manager Mike Ruff, there are silver linings in the form of very strong earnings and some positive economic data from the U.S. Mark Soupiset asks Mike about
these topics and more on this week’s Market Week in Review video webcast.


(Watch the Market Week In Review video)


CORP-7552

Posted in Capital markets insights, Economic and Market Insights, Global economy, Market week in review | Leave a comment

Answering the $64,000 question

What will drive stock prices higher?
Yesterday in my blog post Where do we go from here? I wrote about the fact that we believe the market is at fair value based on the scenario of:

  1. The U.S. recovery is sustainable and very mediocre, consensus at 2.5 percent to 3 percent GDP growth in 2012
  2. Europe is in the middle of a relatively moderate recession, with core Europe in a mild recession and the peripheral countries experiencing depression-like conditions.
  3. China’s growth rate will be near the consensus 8 percent to 8.5 percent range

I also wrote that the driving force behind future increases will be expansion of multiples. As in my previous post, again I will turn to framing the question before answering it, and will do so by talking about three potential paths for the remainder of this year.

  1. The central scenario around the U.S., Europe and China remains stable throughout 2012, because nothing much happens to make the market dismiss it.
    • The key to the multiple expansion premise is the “stability” of market expectations
    • This path would maintain stability and would likely result in multiple expansion
    • The stock market likely goes up
  2. The news, on balance, in the U.S., Europe and China is better than expected in one or all three countries.
    • This path would likely lead to multiple expansion
    • Stock market likely goes up
  3. The news, on balance in the U.S., Europe or China is worse than expected in one or all three countries.
    • This path would lead to multiple contraction, P/E’s and stock prices fall
    • Stock market likely goes down

My view is that the central scenario is likely correct; U.S. growth looks stable and China is more likely than not to crank out the expected growth in 2012. The biggest wild card is Europe. As I have often shared with audiences, forecasting the economy and financial markets is hard enough but that difficultly pales in comparison with trying to forecast the decisions of politicians.

That said, European policy makers are now focused on managing the impact of the current recession while making progress on the massive fiscal challenges they face. The potential for market sentiment volatility around their perceived ability to thread this very fine needle remains very high.

It is with this uncertainty clearly in mind, along with a whole host of other potential threats, that we are telling clients to maintain at least their strategic allocation to equities, if not consider a modest overweight to equities. Bear in mind that risks abound, but if they were not present, neither would the possibility of returns exist.


Investing in capital markets involves risk, principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee that the stated outcomes will be met.

This document contains forecasting or other forward-looking information; the information is inherently uncertain and may be incorrect.

These views are subject to change at any time without notice based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. It is made available on an “as is” basis. Russell Investments does not make any warranty or representation regarding the information. While all material is deemed to be reliable, accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.

This is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security or the services of any organization.

Nothing in this presentation is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. The contents of this presentation are intended for general information purposes only and should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional concerning your own situation and any specific investment questions you may have.

Russell Investment Group, a Washington USA corporation, operates through subsidiaries worldwide, including Russell Investments, and is a subsidiary of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Copyright© Russell Investments 2012. All rights reserved.

Corp-7533-03-2015

Posted in Capital markets insights, Economic and Market Insights, Economy, Global economy, Markets | Leave a comment

Where do we go from here?

Equity markets ran hard in the first quarter. The Russell 1000® Index was up 12.9 percent in the quarter, while the Russell Developed Large Cap Index and the Russell Emerging Markets Index were up net 11.75 percent and 14.65 percent, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, all of these indexes were up more than 25 percent from their 52-week lows in October 2011.

That is a heck of a run and many investors are sensibly asking where do we go from here? Can stocks go up from here and how likely is that? In order to answer these questions you need to frame them appropriately. The simplified framework I offer is in the answering of three questions:

  1. What has the market already priced into in recently very good performance?
  2. What would be the primary driver to a further increase in stock prices?
  3. How likely is that?

What has the market priced into stocks?
No one can ever know precisely what the market has priced into it, but you can make some reasonable deductions. Our market expectation is that the three major factors that have driven global economic and market expectations since the beginning of the economic and market recovery starting in 2009 remain the areas of greatest market focus, namely:

  1. The sustainability of the U.S. economic recovery
  2. Europe
  3. China

In terms of stock prices, we believe that current market levels reflect fair value in the following scenario:

  1. The U.S. recovery is sustainable and very mediocre, consensus at 2.5 percent to 3 percent GDP growth in 2012
  2. Europe is in the middle of a relatively moderate recession, with core Europe in a mild recession and the peripheral countries experiencing depression-like conditions.
  3. China’s growth rate will be near the consensus 8 percent to 8.5 percent range

What would be the primary driver for higher stock prices?
Simply put, further multiple expansion will be the primary driver for higher stock prices.

It’s easy to say, but what does that mean? The global corporate earnings recovery since 2009 has been nothing short of spectacular, but we believe we are well past the point of peak earnings growth in this market cycle. Broadly, margins are at all-time highs and operational productivity leverage is largely played out. This means that future earnings growth will likely be hard yards to gain in the next few years.

How individual companies manage this will have a great deal of impact on their individual stock prices, which, incidentally, will likely lead to a continuation of the positive stock-picking active management environment that we’ve seen this year. More to the point of this conversation however, it’s likely that companies will have to hire more people to create the incremental goods and services necessary to grow.

An increase in employment creates greater confidence in the sustainability – dare we say expansion? – of economic recovery, which in turn leads people to lengthen the timeframe used to assess potential investments. Investors typically become more willing to assign greater value to future expected corporate earnings one, two or three years into the future. Because they expect economic stability, they are more confident that companies will actual achieve expected earnings in 2012 and 2013.

This virtuous circle creates the conditions for multiple, price/earnings (P/E), expansions, which are simply the price that market is willing to pay for a unit of earnings. If the market expects that future earnings growth is more likely now than before, it will likely pay a higher price for the stock. This phenomenon effectively explains why equity markets generally continue to go up even after earnings growth starts to decline. If this is what we see, it will likely lead to modest multiple expansion.

So how likely is this to occur? That’s the $64,000 question, isn’t it? I’ll try to answer that question in tomorrow’s blog post.


Investing in capital markets involves risk, principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee that the stated outcomes will be met.

This document contains forecasting or other forward-looking information; the information is inherently uncertain and may be incorrect.

These views are subject to change at any time without notice based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. It is made available on an “as is” basis. Russell Investments does not make any warranty or representation regarding the information. While all material is deemed to be reliable, accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.

This is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security or the services of any organization.

Nothing in this presentation is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. The contents of this presentation are intended for general information purposes only and should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional concerning your own situation and any specific investment questions you may have.

Russell Investment Group, a Washington USA corporation, operates through subsidiaries worldwide, including Russell Investments, and is a subsidiary of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.

Copyright© Russell Investments 2012. All rights reserved.

Corp-7533-03-2015

Posted in Capital markets insights, Economic and Market Insights, Economy, Global economy, Indexes, Markets | Leave a comment